From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robison v. Sahota

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 12, 2011
No. 2:10-cv-2954 JAM JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 12, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:10-cv-2954 JAM JFM (PC).

August 12, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On June 6, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 6, 2011, are adopted in full;

2. The motion of defendants Grannis, Stocker and Johnson to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part; and

3. Defendants Grannis, Stocker and Johnson shall answer the Eighth Amendment claim raised in plaintiff's complaint within ten days from the date of this order.


Summaries of

Robison v. Sahota

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 12, 2011
No. 2:10-cv-2954 JAM JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 12, 2011)
Case details for

Robison v. Sahota

Case Details

Full title:GLEN W. ROBISON, Plaintiff, v. PARAMVIR SAHOTA, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 12, 2011

Citations

No. 2:10-cv-2954 JAM JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 12, 2011)