From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robinson's Home Outfitting v. Globe

Michigan Court of Appeals
Feb 23, 1971
31 Mich. App. 104 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971)

Opinion

Docket No. 7968.

Decided February 23, 1971.

Appeal from Ingham, Sam Street Hughes, J. Submitted Division 2 December 15, 1970, at Lansing. (Docket No. 7968.) Decided February 23, 1971.

Complaint by Robinson's Home Outfitting Company against Globe Indemnity Company and other insurance companies for breach of contracts. Defendants' motion for summary judgment denied. Defendants appeal. Reversed and remanded with instructions to grant defendants' motion.

Anderson, Carr Street, for plaintiff.

Carl L. Reagh, for defendants.

Before: BRONSON, P.J., and R.B. BURNS and HOFF, JJ.

Circuit judge, sitting on the Court of Appeals by assignment.


The plaintiff's building and its contents were damaged on January 22, 1967. Defendant insurance companies denied liability under the policies on March 21, 1967. On March 1, 1968, the plaintiff instituted this action. The defendants moved for summary judgment under GCR 1963, 117.2(1), and the motion was denied. They now appeal on leave granted.

Defendants contend that the plaintiff has not stated a claim upon which relief can be granted because the suit was commenced more than 12 months after the inception of the loss. In accordance with MCLA §§ 500.2806, 500.2832 (Stat Ann 1957 Rev §§ 24.12806, 24.12832), the policies contained the following clause:

"No suit or action on this policy for the recovery of any claim shall be sustainable in any court of law or equity unless all the requirements of this policy shall have been complied with, and unless commenced within twelve months next after inception of the loss."

This limitation period runs from the date on which the damage occurred, not from the date on which defendants denied liability. Lentz v. Teutonia Fire Insurance Co. (1893), 96 Mich. 445; Barry Finan Lumber Co. v. Citizens' Insurance Co. (1904), 136 Mich. 42; Dahrooge v. Rochester German Insurance Co. (1913), 177 Mich. 442. Cf. Guastello v. Citizens Mutual Insurance Company (1968), 11 Mich. App. 120.

The order of the trial court is reversed and the cause is remanded with instructions to grant the defendants' motion for summary judgment.

Costs to appellants.


Summaries of

Robinson's Home Outfitting v. Globe

Michigan Court of Appeals
Feb 23, 1971
31 Mich. App. 104 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971)
Case details for

Robinson's Home Outfitting v. Globe

Case Details

Full title:ROBINSON'S HOME OUTFITTING COMPANY v. GLOBE INDEMNITY COMPANY

Court:Michigan Court of Appeals

Date published: Feb 23, 1971

Citations

31 Mich. App. 104 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971)
187 N.W.2d 522

Citing Cases

Thomas v. Reliance Ins Co.

Such failure is fatal and requires reversal of the trial court's denial of defendant's motion for summary…

McGuire v. Continental Ins Co.

The limitation period runs from the date on which the damage occurred, not from the date on which defendant…