From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robinson v. Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Dec 2, 2011
CIVIL ACTION No. 11-5702 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 2, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION No. 11-5702

12-02-2011

MIA ROBINSON, a minor, by RACHEL ROBINSON, guardian, and RACHEL ROBINSON, individually, Plaintiffs, v. WOLTERS KLUWER HEALTH, INC., WOLTERS KLUWER UNITED STATES, INC., and PFIZER, INC., Defendants.


ORDER

AND NOW this 2nd day of December, 2011, upon consideration of the Motion to Remand (Doc. No. 11) submitted by Plaintiffs, Mia Robinson, a minor, through her guardian, Rachel Robinson, and Rachel Robinson, individually ("Plaintiffs"), and the response and replies thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that this case is REMANDED back to the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County. The Clerk of Court is hereby directed to MARK this case CLOSED for statistical purposes.

We grant Pfizer's Motion for Leave to File a Sur-Reply (Doc. No. 17) pursuant to Local Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1(c).

Because we find that remand is required in this case, the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 8) submitted by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. and Wolters Kluwer United States, Inc., is hereby DENIED AS MOOT.
--------

BY THE COURT

ROBERT F. KELLY

SENIOR JUDGE


Summaries of

Robinson v. Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Dec 2, 2011
CIVIL ACTION No. 11-5702 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 2, 2011)
Case details for

Robinson v. Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MIA ROBINSON, a minor, by RACHEL ROBINSON, guardian, and RACHEL ROBINSON…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Dec 2, 2011

Citations

CIVIL ACTION No. 11-5702 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 2, 2011)