From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robinson v. Wildenstein Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 15, 1963
19 A.D.2d 807 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Opinion

October 15, 1963


Order, entered on June 26, 1963, unanimously reversed and vacated on the law and on the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, without costs, and motion for the issuance of a commission to take the testimony of certain witnesses residing in Italy denied, without costs. The vital issue in this action involves the authenticity of a certain painting ascribed to a Venetian painter of the sixteenth century, and the resolving of the issue will rest upon the evaluating and weighing of expert testimony. The expert testimony to be presented by plaintiff will represent the crux of her case, and, in order that crucial issues of credibility be properly resolved, it is most important that the experts appear before the trier of the facts and that the defendant be allowed the opportunity before such trier of a searching and full cross-examination in light of their direct testimony and the facts as they are developed on the trial. The plaintiff does not show a lack of availability in New York of art critics and experts who would be well qualified to judge and testify with respect to the genuineness of the particular painting. So, if we assume that the court may in a proper case direct the taking by deposition of the testimony of nonresident expert witnesses (but see CPLR, § 3101, subd. [d]; Reif v. Gebel, 246 App. Div. 776), nevertheless, the motion should have been denied for the failure to make a sufficient and proper showing that the proposed depositions were necessary in prosecution of this action.

Concur — Breitel, J.P., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.


Summaries of

Robinson v. Wildenstein Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 15, 1963
19 A.D.2d 807 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)
Case details for

Robinson v. Wildenstein Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:GLADYS L. ROBINSON, Respondent-Appellant, v. WILDENSTEIN CO., INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 15, 1963

Citations

19 A.D.2d 807 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Citing Cases

Karaduman v. Newsday, Inc.

Special Term granted the order, holding the request necessary to the plaintiff's prosecution of the action…

Bernikow v. Allstate Insurance Company

The court is mindful of the restrictions to such practice. However, in Kraus v. Ford Motor Co. ( 38 A.D.2d…