From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robinson v. Triangle Mechanical Laboratories Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 1, 1934
241 App. Div. 658 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)

Opinion

February, 1934.

Present — Finch, P.J., Merrell, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.


Order reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, upon the ground that the motion was not made within ten days after the service of the answer, as required by rule 109 of the Rules of Civil Practice. ( Hale v. Hirsch, 205 App. Div. 308.) This disposition is, of course, without prejudice to the plaintiffs' right at the trial to move to dismiss the affirmative defense and counterclaim as insufficient in law. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 279.)


Summaries of

Robinson v. Triangle Mechanical Laboratories Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 1, 1934
241 App. Div. 658 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)
Case details for

Robinson v. Triangle Mechanical Laboratories Corp.

Case Details

Full title:RUSSELL ROBINSON and GORDON MILLER, Respondents, v. TRIANGLE MECHANICAL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1934

Citations

241 App. Div. 658 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)

Citing Cases

Zirn v. Bradley

Order granting in part and denying in part plaintiff's motion to examine defendants before trial modified by…