Robinson v. State

Full title: Sherfronski Robinson, Appellant, v. The State of Florida, Appellee.

Court: Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Date published: Sep 25, 2019

280 So. 3d 536 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

No. 3D19-1279

09-25-2019

Sherfronski ROBINSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Sherfronski Robinson, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Sherfronski Robinson, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SCALES, LINDSEY, and LOBREE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 694, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984) ; "The defendant must show that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different. A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.") see also Hurst v. State, 18 So. 3d 975, 996 (Fla. 2009) ("The Court need not reach both Strickland prongs in every case. ‘[W]hen a defendant fails to make a showing as to one prong, it is not necessary to delve into whether he has made a showing as to the other prong.’ " quoting Preston v. State, 970 So. 2d 789, 803 (Fla. 2007) ).