From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robinson v. State

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Jan 29, 2015
NO. 02-14-00434-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 29, 2015)

Opinion

NO. 02-14-00434-CRNO. 02-14-00435-CRNO. 02-14-00436-CRNO. 02-14-00437-CR

01-29-2015

JORDAN ROBINSON APPELLANT v. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE


FROM THE 371ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
TRIAL COURT NOS. 1352363D, 1352439D, 1376531D, 1352443D
MEMORANDUM OPINION

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Appellant Jordan Robinson made open pleas of guilty to robbery causing bodily injury in cause numbers 1352363D and 1376531D and to aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon in cause numbers 1352439D and 1352443D, and the trial court imposed his sentences in open court on September 10, 2014. The trial court signed the judgments on September 15, 2014, and appellant filed his notices of appeal on October 13, 2014.

On November 14, 2014, we notified appellant of our concern that we might not have jurisdiction over his appeals because his notices of appeal were due on October 10, 2014. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1) (requiring appellant to file a notice of appeal within thirty days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court or after the day the trial court enters an appealable order); O'Conner v. State, 266 S.W.3d 575, 577-78 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2008, pet. ref'd) (distinguishing between an "ordinary" appeal of a judgment of conviction, when the thirty-day period begins to run on the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court, and an appeal of some other trial court action, when the appellate timetable begins with the signing of the particular order).

We asked appellant to advise the court whether he had properly addressed, stamped, and mailed the notices of appeal to the proper trial court clerk on or before the due date and listed items we would accept as evidence of proof of mailing. We gave appellant until November 24, 2014, to file his response and warned that we would dismiss the appeals for want of jurisdiction if we determined that they were not timely perfected. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) ("A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke a court of appeal[s's] jurisdiction."). Appellant has not responded to our letter.

Because the record reflects that appellant's sentences were imposed in open court on September 10, 2014, appellant's October 13, 2014 notices of appeal were untimely, and this court lacks jurisdiction over the appeals. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1); O'Conner, 266 S.W.3d at 577. Therefore, we dismiss the appeals for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

/s/ Bonnie Sudderth

BONNIE SUDDERTH

JUSTICE
PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and SUDDERTH, JJ. DO NOT PUBLISH
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
DELIVERED: January 29, 2015


Summaries of

Robinson v. State

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Jan 29, 2015
NO. 02-14-00434-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 29, 2015)
Case details for

Robinson v. State

Case Details

Full title:JORDAN ROBINSON APPELLANT v. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

Court:COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

Date published: Jan 29, 2015

Citations

NO. 02-14-00434-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 29, 2015)