From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robinson v. State

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Jan 16, 2013
Appellate Case No. 2008-098668 (S.C. Ct. App. Jan. 16, 2013)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2008-098668 Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-021

01-16-2013

James Robinson, Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Appellate Defender Susan B. Hackett, of Columbia, for Petitioner. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General Brian T. Petrano, all of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.


Appeal From Richland County

L. Casey Manning, Circuit Court Judge


AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender Susan B. Hackett, of Columbia, for Petitioner.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General Brian T. Petrano, all of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM : Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Corey D., 339 S.C. 107, 117-18, 529 S.E.2d 20, 26 (2000) (approving the consideration of the factors set forth in Kent v. United States, 383 U.S. 541 (1966) by the family court in its decision to waive jurisdiction); State v. Avery, 333 S.C. 284, 292, 509 S.E.2d 476, 481 (1998) (reviewing a family court's order waiving jurisdiction under the abuse of discretion standard of review); State v. Kelsey, 331 S.C. 50, 65, 502 S.E.2d 63, 70-71 (1998) ("It is the responsibility of the family court to include in its waiver of jurisdiction order a sufficient statement of reasons for, and considerations leading to, that decision."); State v. Pittman, 373 S.C. 527, 560, 647 S.E.2d 144, 161 (2007) (affirming the family court's waiver order despite its lack of detail because the order sufficiently demonstrated that a full investigation occurred, and the record supported the family court's decision).

AFFIRMED.

SHORT, KONDUROS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Robinson v. State

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Jan 16, 2013
Appellate Case No. 2008-098668 (S.C. Ct. App. Jan. 16, 2013)
Case details for

Robinson v. State

Case Details

Full title:James Robinson, Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Jan 16, 2013

Citations

Appellate Case No. 2008-098668 (S.C. Ct. App. Jan. 16, 2013)