From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robinson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 6, 1985
335 S.E.2d 2 (Ga. Ct. App. 1985)

Opinion

70582.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 6, 1985.

Drug violation. Columbia Superior Court. Before Judge Pickett.

Jack E. Boone, Jr., Michael C. Garrett, for appellant.

Sam B. Sibley, Jr., District Attorney, Charles R. Sheppard, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.


This appeal is from appellant's conviction for possession of cocaine.

1. Appellant's first enumeration of error is directed at the denial of his motion to suppress. The evidence at the hearing on that motion disclosed that a deputy sheriff received a call from a Georgia State Patrol radio operator informing him that two men in a green station wagon had just attempted to sell cocaine at a service station and had then headed east on I-20. The deputy was located at the next exit and waited there for the vehicle to pass. When it did, he followed. After observing that the vehicle was exceeding the speed limit, and after waiting for a back-up unit to be in position to assist, the deputy pulled the vehicle over. The driver and appellant were required to exit the vehicle and lie down while they were searched and handcuffed. Both arrestees were then placed in the deputy's car until the arrival of an investigator who had been summoned by the deputy. The investigator directed the deputies to search the car, resulting in the discovery of a small quantity of marijuana on the floor and a quantity of cocaine in the glove compartment.

We find those facts sufficient to show probable cause for the stop, arrest, and search. Williams v. State, 173 Ga. App. 207 (1) ( 325 S.E.2d 783) (1984). The denial of the motion to suppress was not error.

2. The denial of appellant's motions for directed verdict, made at the close of the state's evidence and the close of all the evidence, is the subject of appellant's second and third enumerations of error.

The evidence at trial was essentially the same as that at the motion to suppress hearing with the addition of the testimony of the service station operator to whom appellant allegedly offered the cocaine. That witness positively identified appellant as the person who offered to barter cocaine for oil. That testimony was sufficient to take this case outside the equal access rule of Elrod v. State, 128 Ga. App. 250 (1) ( 196 S.E.2d 360) (1973). Since there was more evidence connecting appellant with the cocaine than his mere presence in the car in which it was found, there was no error in denying appellant's motions for a directed verdict. Fears v. State, 169 Ga. App. 172 ( 312 S.E.2d 174) (1983). The evidence at trial was sufficient to authorize a rational trier of fact to find appellant guilty of the offense charged beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560) (1979); Benson v. State, 172 Ga. App. 135 ( 322 S.E.2d 339) (1984).

Judgment affirmed. Banke, C. J., and McMurray, P. J., concur.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 6, 1985.


Summaries of

Robinson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 6, 1985
335 S.E.2d 2 (Ga. Ct. App. 1985)
Case details for

Robinson v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROBINSON v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Sep 6, 1985

Citations

335 S.E.2d 2 (Ga. Ct. App. 1985)
335 S.E.2d 2

Citing Cases

Reeves v. State

The evidence adduced at trial when viewed in favor of the verdict was sufficient for a rational trier of fact…

Hill v. State

While there are conflicts in the evidence, we find that the evidence adduced at trial was sufficient to…