From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robinson v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 22, 2010
No. CIV S-05-0342 JAM DAD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-0342 JAM DAD P.

February 22, 2010


ORDER


Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 16, 2009, the assigned district judge dismissed this action without prejudice due to plaintiff's failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Pending before the court is plaintiff's motion for a certificate of appealability.

Plaintiff is advised that the requirements for a certificate of appealability apply to claims for habeas corpus relief. Plaintiff does not need a certificate of appealability to appeal from the dismissal of his civil rights action brought under § 1983.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for a certificate of appealability (Doc. No. 66) is denied as unnecessary.


Summaries of

Robinson v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 22, 2010
No. CIV S-05-0342 JAM DAD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2010)
Case details for

Robinson v. Runnels

Case Details

Full title:A.C. ROBINSON, Plaintiff, v. D.L. RUNNELS, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 22, 2010

Citations

No. CIV S-05-0342 JAM DAD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2010)