From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robinson v. Null

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA HUNTINGTON DIVISION
Mar 8, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-4126 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 8, 2018)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-4126

03-08-2018

COURTNEY RICARDO ROBINSON, Plaintiff, v. CINDY NULL; LAHOMA WENTZ; and CABELL COUNT MAGISTRATE COURT, Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

This action was referred to the Honorable Cheryl A. Eifert, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The Magistrate Judge has submitted findings of fact and recommended that Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 2) be dismissed, with prejudice, and this civil action be removed from the docket of the Court. Neither party has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's findings and recommendations.

Accordingly, the Court accepts and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and ORDERS that Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 2) be DISMISSED, with prejudice, and this civil action be REMOVED from the docket of the Court, consistent with the findings and recommendations.

The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to forward copies of this written opinion and order to all counsel of record, and any unrepresented parties.

ENTER: March 8, 2018

/s/_________

ROBERT C. CHAMBERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Robinson v. Null

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA HUNTINGTON DIVISION
Mar 8, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-4126 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 8, 2018)
Case details for

Robinson v. Null

Case Details

Full title:COURTNEY RICARDO ROBINSON, Plaintiff, v. CINDY NULL; LAHOMA WENTZ; and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA HUNTINGTON DIVISION

Date published: Mar 8, 2018

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-4126 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 8, 2018)

Citing Cases

Gibbs v. Ames

Although the Court is required to liberally construe pro se documents, “this requirement does not eliminate…