From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robinson v. [No Defendants Named]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 30, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02505-BNB (D. Colo. Oct. 30, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-02505-BNB

10-30-2012

ARQUEZ D. ROBINSON, Plaintiff, v. [NO DEFENDANTS NAMED], Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff, Arquez D. Robinson, initiated this action by filing pro se a letter to the Court (ECF No. 1) complaining about the conditions of his confinement and seeking assistance with respect to the conditions of his confinement. On September 21, 2012, Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland entered an order directing Mr. Robinson to cure certain deficiencies if he wished to pursue his claims. Specifically, Magistrate Judge Boland ordered Mr. Robinson to file a Prisoner Complaint on the proper form and to either pay the $350.00 filing fee or file a Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 along with a certified copy of his inmate trust fund account statement in support of the 28 U.S.C. § 1915 motion. Mr. Robinson was warned that the action would be dismissed without further notice if he failed to cure the deficiencies within thirty days.

Mr. Robinson has failed to cure the deficiencies within the time allowed and he has failed to respond in any way to Magistrate Judge Boland's September 21 order. Therefore, the action will be dismissed without prejudice for failure to cure the deficiencies.

Furthermore, the Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status will be denied for the purpose of appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962). If Plaintiff files a notice of appeal he also must pay the full $455 appellate filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit within thirty days in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 24. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the action is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure because Mr. Robinson failed to cure the deficiencies as directed. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied without prejudice to the filing of a motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.

DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 30th day of October, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

______________________________

LEWIS T. BABCOCK, Senior Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Robinson v. [No Defendants Named]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 30, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02505-BNB (D. Colo. Oct. 30, 2012)
Case details for

Robinson v. [No Defendants Named]

Case Details

Full title:ARQUEZ D. ROBINSON, Plaintiff, v. [NO DEFENDANTS NAMED], Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Oct 30, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-02505-BNB (D. Colo. Oct. 30, 2012)