Robinson v. McNeil

Full title: ROBERT ROBINSON, Petitioner, v. WALTER A. McNEIL, Respondent

Court: United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Gainesville Division

Date published: Mar 11, 2008

CASE NO. 1:08-cv-26-MP-AK (N.D. Fla. Mar. 11, 2008)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:08-cv-26-MP-AK.

March 11, 2008

ORDER

ALLAN KORNBLUM, Magistrate Judge

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 12, Amended Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by Robert Robinson. Petitioner has not submitted a financial certificate which has been completed by a prison official or a six-month statement of account. Thus, the motion for IFP requires amendment. Petitioner will therefore be required to file a second amended motion for IFP in this case, which includes the necessary financial certification and account information.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

That Walter A. McNeil is hereby SUBSTITUTED in place of James McDonough as the proper respondent;

That the Clerk shall forward to Petitioner an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis;

That Petitioner shall have until April 10, 2008, to file a second amended application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis which includes his inmate account information, clearly designated as an "amended" application, or pay the $5.00 filing fee;

That failure to respond to this order as instructed will result in a recommendation of dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with an order of this court.

DONE AND ORDERED.