From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robinson v. Johnson

U.S.
May 5, 1969
394 U.S. 847 (1969)

Opinion

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS.

No. 67.

Decided May 5, 1969.

Affirmed.

William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, Thomas E. Brannigan, Assistant Attorney General, John J. Stamos, and Daniel P. Coman for appellants.


The judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK dissents for the reasons given in the dissenting opinion of THE CHIEF JUSTICE in Shapiro v. Thompson, ante, p. 644.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissents for the reasons given in his dissenting opinion in Shapiro v. Thompson, ante, p. 655.


Summaries of

Robinson v. Johnson

U.S.
May 5, 1969
394 U.S. 847 (1969)
Case details for

Robinson v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:ROBINSON ET AL. v . JOHNSON ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: May 5, 1969

Citations

394 U.S. 847 (1969)

Citing Cases

Todd v. Oklahoma State Democratic Central Comm.

p. 156. In Johnson, et al., v. Robinson, et al., D.C.E.D.Ill., 1969, 296 F. Supp. 1165; aff'd 394 U.S. 847,…

Rodriguez v. Swank

Moreover, similar class actions have been allowed when less than all possible kinds of eligible welfare…