From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robinson v. Huntingdon

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
Feb 16, 2016
131 A.3d 985 (Pa. 2016)

Opinion

No. 34 EAP 2015

02-16-2016

Gregory ROBINSON, Appellant v. Superintendant HUNTINGDON and Department of Corrections, Appellees.

Gregory Robinson, Huntingdon, pro se. Theron Richard Perez, Maria Gerarda Macus, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Mechanicsburg, for Superintendant Huntingdon and Department of Corrections.


Gregory Robinson, Huntingdon, pro se.

Theron Richard Perez, Maria Gerarda Macus, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Mechanicsburg, for Superintendant Huntingdon and Department of Corrections.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 16th day of February 2016, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is AFFIRMED.

Justice EAKIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.


Summaries of

Robinson v. Huntingdon

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
Feb 16, 2016
131 A.3d 985 (Pa. 2016)
Case details for

Robinson v. Huntingdon

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY ROBINSON, Appellant v. SUPERINTENDANT HUNTINGDON AND DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

Date published: Feb 16, 2016

Citations

131 A.3d 985 (Pa. 2016)

Citing Cases

Robinson v. Huntingdon

2016-02-16 Gregory ROBINSON, Appellant v. Superintendant HUNTINGDON and Department of Corrections, Appellees.…