From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robinson v. Houck & Schatz

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Aug 2, 2024
2:23-cv-10255 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 2, 2024)

Opinion

2:23-cv-10255

08-02-2024

TYRONE ROBINSON, Plaintiff, v. HOUCK and SCHATZ, Defendants.


Honorable Anthony P. Patti, United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

SUSAN K. DECLERCQ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On July 15, 2024, Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti issued a report recommending that this Court deny Defendants' motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 23. Judge Patti provided 14 days to object, but the parties did not do so. They have therefore forfeited their right to appeal Judge Patti's findings. See Berkshire v. Dahl, 928 F.3d 520, 530-31 (6th Cir. 2019) (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985)). Moreover, there is no prejudicial clear error in the report.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 23, is ADOPTED. Further, it is ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 15, is DENIED.


Summaries of

Robinson v. Houck & Schatz

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Aug 2, 2024
2:23-cv-10255 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 2, 2024)
Case details for

Robinson v. Houck & Schatz

Case Details

Full title:TYRONE ROBINSON, Plaintiff, v. HOUCK and SCHATZ, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Aug 2, 2024

Citations

2:23-cv-10255 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 2, 2024)