From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robinson v. Hamby

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Columbia Division
Jan 17, 2006
No. 1:04-0067 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 17, 2006)

Opinion

No. 1:04-0067.

January 17, 2006


ORDER


Before the Court are two Reports and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge (Docket Entry Nos. 64 and 68), recommending that the Plaintiff's motion to amend (Docket Entry No. 35) be denied and that the Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Docket Entry No. 38) be granted, in part, and denied in part, to dismiss all Defendants except Defendants Bill Hamby and Philip King on Plaintiff's excessive use of force claim against the latter Defendants.

The Court has considered de novo the parties' objections to these Reports and Recommendations (Docket Entry Nos. 65, 69, 70 and 71). After a review, the Court ADOPTS the Reports and Recommendations and the Plaintiff's motion to amend (Docket Entry No. 35) is DENIED and the Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Docket Entry No. 38) is GRANTED in part, to dismiss the Defendants Anthony Norwood, Miller Meadows, Eddie Bass, Carol Ann Johnson and the Giles County Sheriff's Department. The Defendants' motion for summary judgment is DENIED, in part, as to the Plaintiff's claims for use of excessive force against the Defendants Bill Hamby and Philip King, in their individual capacities. The Plaintiff's proof is legally insufficient to support any claim against Giles County.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Robinson v. Hamby

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Columbia Division
Jan 17, 2006
No. 1:04-0067 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 17, 2006)
Case details for

Robinson v. Hamby

Case Details

Full title:JOHN BRADFORD ROBINSON, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER BILL HAMBY, et al., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Columbia Division

Date published: Jan 17, 2006

Citations

No. 1:04-0067 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 17, 2006)