From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robinson v. Doe

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 28, 2022
3:21-cv-210-KAP (W.D. Pa. Dec. 28, 2022)

Opinion

3:21-cv-210-KAP

12-28-2022

DARIUS ROBINSON, Plaintiff v. LIUTENANT (sic) JANE DOE, et al., Defendants


MEMORANDUM ORDER

Keith A. Pesto, United States Magistrate Judge

I ordered plaintiff's complaint to be served on defendants and the Marshal accordingly did so, beginning as is customary with a waiver of service. ECF no. 14, ECF no. 18. No waiver has been returned, nor has counsel appeared for any defendant.

The plaintiff shall complete new forms (USM-285) for service on the non-Doe defendants and forward them to the Clerk. The Clerk shall issue summonses and Marshal shall make personal service of the complaint on the non-Doe defendants Salyard, Gaudet, and Weidlich as directed by plaintiff, costs of service to be advanced by the United States. Pursuant to Rule 4, upon service defendants shall show cause why service costs should not be imposed on them.

Plaintiff shall notify the Clerk in writing of any change of address. Failure to provide a current address may lead to the dismissal of this matter.


Summaries of

Robinson v. Doe

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 28, 2022
3:21-cv-210-KAP (W.D. Pa. Dec. 28, 2022)
Case details for

Robinson v. Doe

Case Details

Full title:DARIUS ROBINSON, Plaintiff v. LIUTENANT (sic) JANE DOE, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 28, 2022

Citations

3:21-cv-210-KAP (W.D. Pa. Dec. 28, 2022)