From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robinson v. Corporate Express, Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. California
Sep 20, 2005
Case No. C05-01720 WHA (N.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2005)

Opinion

Case No. C05-01720 WHA.

Complaint Filed: January 6, 2005

September 20, 2005

JEAN K. HYAMS, ESQ., LESLIE F. LEVY, ESQ., DARCI E. BURRELL, ESQ., BOXER GERSON, LLP, Oakland, California, Attorneys for Plaintiff.

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP, Patricia H. Cullison, Attorneys for Defendants.


STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL


IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their counsel that the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41 (a)(1) with each party to bear its own attorneys fees and costs.

The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement for only 90 days.

ORDER

The case management conference, currently scheduled for SEPTEMBER 22, 2005 AT 2 P.M., is VACATED. IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Robinson v. Corporate Express, Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. California
Sep 20, 2005
Case No. C05-01720 WHA (N.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2005)
Case details for

Robinson v. Corporate Express, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MAX ROBINSON Plaintiff, v. CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC., and DOES 1 through 10…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Sep 20, 2005

Citations

Case No. C05-01720 WHA (N.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2005)