From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robinson v. Cigna

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 12, 1995
216 A.D.2d 375 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

June 12, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCabe, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, and the motion for partial summary judgment dismissing the first through fourth causes of action asserted in the complaint is granted.

We agree with the defendant that the respondents raised no triable issues of fact with regard to their contention that they are entitled to annual cost-of-living increases pursuant to the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act. Even assuming, arguendo, that the respondents were covered under that act, in order to qualify for the relief they seek thereunder a beneficiary must be determined to have sustained a "permanent total disability" ( 33 U.S.C. § 910 [f]). In this case, the Workers' Compensation Board determined that each respondent had sustained only a "partial permanent disability". Balletta, J.P., Thompson, Santucci, Altman and Hart, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Robinson v. Cigna

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 12, 1995
216 A.D.2d 375 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Robinson v. Cigna

Case Details

Full title:ELIZABETH A.M. ROBINSON et al., Respondents, et al., Plaintiff, v. CIGNA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 12, 1995

Citations

216 A.D.2d 375 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
628 N.Y.S.2d 169