From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robinson v. Caruso

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Sep 7, 2010
Case No. 08-14069 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 7, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 08-14069.

September 7, 2010


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


Plaintiff, a pro se inmate, filed a complaint alleging that she has received constitutionally insufficient dental care in violation of the Eighth Amendment. This matter is currently before the Court on Magistrate Judge Hluchaniuk's Report and Recommendation [dkt 120], in which the Magistrate Judge recommends that Defendants Bielak, Kulkarni, Neigbors, and John Doe be dismissed with prejudice, and Defendant Neigbors's motion for summary judgment be denied as moot. No objections were filed to the Report and Recommendation.

The Court has thoroughly reviewed the court file and the Report and Recommendation. As a result of that review, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and enters it as the findings and conclusions of this Court.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to dismiss [dkt 118] is GRANTED with respect to Defendants Bielak, Kulkarni, Neigbors, and John Doe, and those defendants are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The motion to dismiss is DENIED as MOOT with respect to Defendants Ethridge, Osbourne, St. Joseph Mercy Hospital, and Feison, because those defendants have previously been dismissed with prejudice from this lawsuit.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Neigbors's motion for summary judgment [dkt 113] is DENIED as MOOT.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 7, 2010


Summaries of

Robinson v. Caruso

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Sep 7, 2010
Case No. 08-14069 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 7, 2010)
Case details for

Robinson v. Caruso

Case Details

Full title:HEATHER ROBINSON, Plaintiff, v. PATRICIA CARUSO et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Sep 7, 2010

Citations

Case No. 08-14069 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 7, 2010)