From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robinson v. Byrne

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 16, 1951
278 App. Div. 783 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)

Opinion

April 16, 1951.


Appeal by defendant from a judgment enjoining him from interfering with gas pipes, electric light and telephone wires running across defendant's premises and serving plaintiffs' premises, and further granting judgment to plaintiffs for $678.68 damages for wrongful breaking of a water pipe which crossed defendant's property. Judgment reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, and the complaint dismissed on the law, with costs. At the time of the conveyance by Campbell to Almon on December 1, 1945, there were no water pipes, gas mains, electric or telephone wires serving any part of the premises now owned by plaintiffs. These easements were not necessary for the reasonable use of that part of the property granted at that time which is now owned by plaintiffs and, therefore, may not be implied. Plaintiffs Tufts in the companion action may not subject defendant's property to servitude or use in connection with the premises of plaintiffs Robinson in the present action. ( McCullough v. Broad Exch. Co., 101 App. Div. 566, 572, affd. 184 N.Y. 592.) (See Tufts v. Byrne, post, p. 783, decided simultaneously herewith.) Johnston, Acting P.J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Robinson v. Byrne

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 16, 1951
278 App. Div. 783 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)
Case details for

Robinson v. Byrne

Case Details

Full title:CARL W. ROBINSON et al., Respondents, v. LAWRENCE S. BYRNE, JR., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 16, 1951

Citations

278 App. Div. 783 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)

Citing Cases

Foti v. Noftsier

In order to establish the existence of an easement by necessity, plaintiffs were required to prove by clear…