From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robinson v. Aramark

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jun 26, 2012
3:12-CV-B-BK (N.D. Tex. Jun. 26, 2012)

Opinion

3:12-CV-B-BK

06-26-2012

ALICIA S. ROBINSON, Plaintiff, v. ARAMARK, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions and a recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, DISMISSES Plaintiff's complaint with prejudice as frivolous, see 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), and WARNS Plaintiff that sanctions may be imposed if she persists in filing frivolous lawsuits.

The Court CERTIFIES that any appeal of this action would not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). In support of this finding, the Court adopts and incorporates by reference the Magistrate Judge's Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 n.21 (5th Cir. 1997). Based on the Findings and Recommendation, the Court finds that any appeal of this action would present no legal point of arguable merit and

would, therefore, be frivolous. Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983).

______________________

JANE J. BOYLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Robinson v. Aramark

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jun 26, 2012
3:12-CV-B-BK (N.D. Tex. Jun. 26, 2012)
Case details for

Robinson v. Aramark

Case Details

Full title:ALICIA S. ROBINSON, Plaintiff, v. ARAMARK, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Jun 26, 2012

Citations

3:12-CV-B-BK (N.D. Tex. Jun. 26, 2012)