From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robinson v. Andrews

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Norfolk Division
May 5, 2020
Action No. 2:19cv133 (E.D. Va. May. 5, 2020)

Opinion

Action No. 2:19cv133

05-05-2020

EVERETT F. ROBINSON, #30296-007, Petitioner, v. JUSTIN ANDREWS, Warden, Respondent.


FINAL ORDER

Petitioner Everett F. Robinson ("Robinson"), a federal inmate housed in the Federal Correctional Complex in Petersburg, Virginia, filed a pro se petition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. ECF No. 1. Robinson asserts the Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") failed to properly calculate his release date in accordance with the First Step Act ("the Act"), and he seeks 119 days of good conduct time. Id. at 1, 5.

The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Rule 72 of the Rules of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia for Report and Recommendation. ECF No. 2. The Report and Recommendation, filed March 10, 2020, recommends that respondent's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 6) be granted and Robinson's petition (ECF No. 1) be dismissed with prejudice. ECF No. 9. Each party was advised of the right to file written objections to the findings and recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed, and the time for filing objections has expired.

The Court, having reviewed the record, does hereby adopt and approve the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report and Recommendation. The Court, therefore, ORDERS that respondent's motion to dismiss, ECF No. 6, is GRANTED, and the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, ECF No. 1, is DENIED and DISMISSED as MOOT, Plaintiff having received his requested relief on the First Step Act through the Bureau of Prisons.

As an aside, Plaintiff also failed to exhaust his administrative remedies prior to the filing in this court. --------

Robinson has failed to demonstrate "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right," and, therefore, the Court declines to issue any certificate of appealability pursuant to Rule 22(b) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 327, 335-36 (2003).

Robinson is ADVISED that because a certificate of appealability is denied by this Court, he may seek a certificate from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Rules Gov. § 2254 Cases in U.S. Dist. Cts. 11(a). If Robinson intends to seek a certificate of appealability from the Fourth Circuit, he must do so within thirty (30) days from the date of this Final Order. Robinson may seek such a certificate by filing a written notice of appeal with the Clerk of the United States District Court, United States Courthouse, 600 Granby Street, Norfolk, Virginia 23510.

The Clerk shall forward a copy of this final order to Robinson and counsel of record for respondent.

/s/ _________

Rebecca Beach Smith

Senior United States District Judge Norfolk, Virginia
May 5, 2020


Summaries of

Robinson v. Andrews

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Norfolk Division
May 5, 2020
Action No. 2:19cv133 (E.D. Va. May. 5, 2020)
Case details for

Robinson v. Andrews

Case Details

Full title:EVERETT F. ROBINSON, #30296-007, Petitioner, v. JUSTIN ANDREWS, Warden…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Norfolk Division

Date published: May 5, 2020

Citations

Action No. 2:19cv133 (E.D. Va. May. 5, 2020)