From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robinson v. Adams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 2, 2011
CASE NO. 1:08-cv-01380-AWI-SMS PC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 2, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:08-cv-01380-AWI-SMS PC ECF No. 120

09-02-2011

GEORGE H. ROBINSON, Plaintiff, v. D. ADAMS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO

SCHEDULE PRETRIAL AND TRIAL DATES

AS PREMATURE

On July 1, 15, and 25, 2011, Plaintiff filed motions for reconsideration by the District Judge of the order granting in part and denying in part his motion to compel. On August 31, 2011, Plaintiff filed a motion to schedule the pretrial and trial dates in this action. Since there are still discovery issues pending in this action, Plaintiff's motion shall be denied as premature. Once Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration has been decided by the District Judge, and all discovery issues are resolved, an order will issue setting dates in this action.

Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion to schedule pretrial and trial dates is HEREBY DENIED as premature. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Sandra M. Snyder

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Robinson v. Adams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 2, 2011
CASE NO. 1:08-cv-01380-AWI-SMS PC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 2, 2011)
Case details for

Robinson v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE H. ROBINSON, Plaintiff, v. D. ADAMS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 2, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 1:08-cv-01380-AWI-SMS PC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 2, 2011)