If BSI did not agree that that was what the jury intended, it was incumbent on BSI — not defendants — to ask the jury to correct any alleged defect. See Robin v. Knuth, 108 Or. App. 207, 815 P.2d 704 (1991) (trial court erred in refusing to accept jury's verdict finding for plaintiff on breach of contract claim but awarding plaintiff "$ 0" in damages; under ORCP 61A(2), the verdict was legally sufficient). The effect of the majority's opinion is that a defendant now will be required to ask the judge to resubmit a verdict which is in the defendant's favor.