Opinion
Nos. 05-06-00633-CR, 05-06-00634-CR, 05-06-00635-CR
Opinion Filed July 20, 2007. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex. R. App. P. 47.
On Appeal from the 195th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause Nos. F05-56256-JN, F05-56257-LN, F05-56258-JN.
Before Justices MOSELEY, O'NEILL, and FITZGERALD.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
A jury convicted Thomas Earl Robertson of possession with intent to deliver cocaine in an amount of four grams or more but less than 200 grams, possession of marijuana in an amount of more than four ounces, and unlawful possession of a firearm by a felon. See Tex. Health Safety Code Ann. §§ 481.112, 481.121 (Vernon 2003); Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 46.04 (Vernon Supp. 2006). During the punishment phase, appellant pleaded true to two enhancement paragraphs in the possession of marijuana case. The jury assessed prison sentences of five years, two years, and two years and six months, respectively. Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex.Crim.App. 2005). We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court's judgment.