From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robertson v. Singh

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 19, 2009
No. CIV S-09-2648 KJM P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 19, 2009)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-2648 KJM P.

November 19, 2009


ORDER


Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's motion for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for the appointment of counsel (Docket No. 6) is denied.


Summaries of

Robertson v. Singh

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 19, 2009
No. CIV S-09-2648 KJM P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 19, 2009)
Case details for

Robertson v. Singh

Case Details

Full title:HAROLD ROBERTSON, Plaintiff, v. V. SINGH, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 19, 2009

Citations

No. CIV S-09-2648 KJM P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 19, 2009)