From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robertson v. Schoonmaker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1934
243 App. Div. 536 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)

Opinion

December, 1934.


Order in a stockholder's derivative action denying motion of defendant Kingston Dry Dock Construction Co., Inc., to vacate receivership affirmed, without costs, on condition that within five days from the entry of the order herein the defendant, respondent, consent to proceed to trial within twenty days, at which time this court directs the case to be placed on the Special Term calendar to be tried subject to the direction of the justice then presiding; and in default of such consent, the order denying the motion to vacate the receivership, so far as the Kingston Dry Dock Construction Co., Inc., is concerned, is reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs. No opinion. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Robertson v. Schoonmaker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1934
243 App. Div. 536 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)
Case details for

Robertson v. Schoonmaker

Case Details

Full title:DOUGLAS O. ROBERTSON, Suing for Himself as Stockholder and All Other…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1934

Citations

243 App. Div. 536 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)