Robertson v. Qadri

Full title: WADE ROBERTSON, Plaintiff, v. SHIRAZ QADRI, AVENIR RESTAURANT GROUP, INC…

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Jose Division

Date published: Jan 30, 2007

C 06-04624 JF (N.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2007)

Opinion

WADE ROBERTSON, Plaintiff, v. SHIRAZ QADRI, AVENIR RESTAURANT GROUP, INC. and GREG ST. CLAIRE, Defendants. No. C 06-04624 JF United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division. January 30, 2007

          ORDER ¹ DENYING MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME AND CHANGE HEARING DATE WITHOUT PREJUDICE [re: docket no. 56]

1 This disposition is not designated for publication and may not be cited.

          JEREMY FOGEL, District Judge.

         Plaintiff Wade Robertson, proceeding pro se, moves to enlarge time and change hearing date of Defendants' motion to dismiss. The Court has reviewed the papers filed by the parties. The motion will be denied without prejudice because of Plaintiff's delay in seeking relief and his failure to explain adequately the reason for his request. If Plaintiff wishes to renew his motion, he should inform the Court of the specific nature of the conflict upon which his request is based and the reason for his failure to seek relief earlier.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.