From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robertson v. McDow

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Greenville Division
Aug 24, 2006
Civil Action No. 6:05-2776-HFF-BHH (D.S.C. Aug. 24, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 6:05-2776-HFF-BHH.

August 24, 2006


ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND AFFIRMING THE DECISION OF THE BANKRUPTCY COURT


This is a bankruptcy appeal. Appellant is proceeding pro se. The matter is before the Court for review of the Report and Recommendation (Report) of the United States Magistrate Judge suggesting that the decision of the bankruptcy court be affirmed. The Report is made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Local Civil Rule 73.02 for the District of South Carolina.

The Magistrate Judge makes only a recommendation to this Court. The recommendation has no presumptive weight. The responsibility to make a final determination remains with the Court. Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270 (1976). The Court is charged with making a de novo determination of those portions of the Report to which specific objection is made, and the Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge or recommit the matter with instructions. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

The Magistrate Judge filed the Report on August 2, 2006. Appellant failed to file any objections to the Report. In the absence of objections, the Court is not required to give any explanation for adopting the recommendation. Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983). Moreover, a failure to object waives appellate review on those issues. Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985).

The Court notes that Appellant is likely unaware of the Report since, on August 23, 2006, Appellant's copy of the Report was returned to the Clerk of Court, marked "Return to Sender[.] Box Closed[.] In light of Appellant's failure to keep the Court apprised of his current mailing address as directed to do so by the Order filed October 6, 2005, the Court would ordinarily dismiss the appeal. In this instance, however, and after having made a de novo review of the record and the comprehensive and well-reasoned Report of the Magistrate Judge, the Court is of the opinion that the better course here is to affirm the bankruptcy court's decision. The Court will, therefore, enter judgment accordingly.

After a thorough review of the Report and the record in this case, the Court adopts the Report and incorporates it. Therefore, it is the judgment of this Court that the decision of the bankruptcy court is hereby AFFIRMED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Robertson v. McDow

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Greenville Division
Aug 24, 2006
Civil Action No. 6:05-2776-HFF-BHH (D.S.C. Aug. 24, 2006)
Case details for

Robertson v. McDow

Case Details

Full title:JAY DICKSON ROBERTSON, Appellant, v. W. CLARKSON McDOW, JR., United States…

Court:United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Greenville Division

Date published: Aug 24, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 6:05-2776-HFF-BHH (D.S.C. Aug. 24, 2006)

Citing Cases

In re Henderson

As recently discussed in In re Robertson, there is a presumption that every person is competent to be a…