From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robertson v. Hanover Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Jul 2, 2019
Civil Action No. 3:19CV320 (E.D. Va. Jul. 2, 2019)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:19CV320

07-02-2019

STEVEN MOURICE ROBERTSON, Plaintiff, v. HANOVER COUNTY, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

On May 10, 2019, the Court conditionally docketed Plaintiff's action. Plaintiff requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis. By Memorandum Order entered on June 11, 2019, the Court directed Plaintiff to pay an initial partial filing fee of $.26 or state under penalty of perjury that he did not have sufficient assets to pay such a fee within eleven (11) days of the date of entry thereof. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). Plaintiff has neither paid the initial partial filing fee nor averred that he cannot pay such a fee. Therefore, Plaintiff is not entitled to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff's disregard of the Court's directives warrants dismissal of the action. Accordingly, the action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

An appropriate Order shall issue.

/s/_________

M. Hannah Lauck

United States District Judge Date: JUL - 2 2019
Richmond, Virginia


Summaries of

Robertson v. Hanover Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Jul 2, 2019
Civil Action No. 3:19CV320 (E.D. Va. Jul. 2, 2019)
Case details for

Robertson v. Hanover Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN MOURICE ROBERTSON, Plaintiff, v. HANOVER COUNTY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division

Date published: Jul 2, 2019

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:19CV320 (E.D. Va. Jul. 2, 2019)