From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robertson v. Dir., TDCJ-CID

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Nov 10, 2020
3:20-CV-3169-X-BK (N.D. Tex. Nov. 10, 2020)

Opinion

3:20-CV-3169-X-BK

11-10-2020

ARTHUR L. ROBERTSON, Petitioner, v. DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS , CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the successive habeas petition is TRANSFERRED to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3); 28 U.S.C. § 1631. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.

An order transferring a successive application to the court of appeals is not a final order requiring a certificate of appealability. See United States v. Fulton, 780 F.3d 683, 688 (5th Cir. 2015); Brewer v. Stephens, 605 F. App'x 417 (5th Cir. 2015) (per curiam). --------

IT IS SO ORDERED this 10th day of November 2020.

/s/_________

BRANTLEY STARR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Robertson v. Dir., TDCJ-CID

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Nov 10, 2020
3:20-CV-3169-X-BK (N.D. Tex. Nov. 10, 2020)
Case details for

Robertson v. Dir., TDCJ-CID

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR L. ROBERTSON, Petitioner, v. DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Nov 10, 2020

Citations

3:20-CV-3169-X-BK (N.D. Tex. Nov. 10, 2020)