From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robertson v. Cooks

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Aug 12, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:19-cv-376-TFM-B (S.D. Ala. Aug. 12, 2019)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:19-cv-376-TFM-B

08-12-2019

RONALD WAYNE ROBERTSON, # 241992, Petitioner, v. WARDEN COOKS, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

On July 18, 2019, the Magistrate Judge entered a Report and Recommendations which recommends that Petitioner's habeas corpus petitions (Docs. 1, 4) be dismissed as improper successive opinions. No objections were filed.

Accordingly, after due and proposed consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. Therefore, Petitioner Ronald Wayne Robertson's habeas corpus petitions (Docs. 1, 4) are DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction, on the ground that they are second or successive petitions under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b).

Final judgment shall issue separately in accordance with this order and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58.

DONE and ORDERED this 12th day of August, 2019.

/s/Terry F. Moorer

TERRY F. MOORER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Robertson v. Cooks

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Aug 12, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:19-cv-376-TFM-B (S.D. Ala. Aug. 12, 2019)
Case details for

Robertson v. Cooks

Case Details

Full title:RONALD WAYNE ROBERTSON, # 241992, Petitioner, v. WARDEN COOKS, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 12, 2019

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:19-cv-376-TFM-B (S.D. Ala. Aug. 12, 2019)