From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robertson v. Citadel Broad.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 13, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:CV-12-127 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 13, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:CV-12-127

02-13-2012

CINDY ROBERTSON Plaintiff v. CITADEL BROADCASTING, et al. Defendants


(Chief Judge Kane)

(Magistrate Judge Carlson)


ORDER

Before the court in the captioned action is a January 24, 2012 Report and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Carlson. No timely objections have been filed. Accordingly, upon review of the record and the applicable law, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED THAT:

1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Carlson.

2) Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED.

3) Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without prejudice to the plaintiff endeavoring to correct the defects cited in this report, provided that the plaintiff acts within 20 days of any dismissal order.

4) The case is REMANDED to Magistrate Judge Carlson.

_________________

YVETTE KANE, Chief Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Robertson v. Citadel Broad.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 13, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:CV-12-127 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 13, 2012)
Case details for

Robertson v. Citadel Broad.

Case Details

Full title:CINDY ROBERTSON Plaintiff v. CITADEL BROADCASTING, et al. Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Feb 13, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:CV-12-127 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 13, 2012)