From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robertson v. Cain

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Jun 10, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-350-JJB-SCR (M.D. La. Jun. 10, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-350-JJB-SCR

06-10-2014

DOUGLAS ROBERTSON (#91333) v. N. BURL CAIN, ET AL.


RULING

The court has carefully considered the petition, the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger dated May 23, 2014 (doc. no. 42), The plaintiff filed an objection which merely restates his prior argument and has been duly considered.

The court hereby approves the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and adopts it as the court's opinion herein. Accordingly, the Motion for Reconsideration of dismissed Writ of Habeas Corpus, treated as a motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b), is denied.

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, this 10th day of June, 2014.

__________

JAMES J. BRADY, JUDGE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

Robertson v. Cain

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Jun 10, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-350-JJB-SCR (M.D. La. Jun. 10, 2014)
Case details for

Robertson v. Cain

Case Details

Full title:DOUGLAS ROBERTSON (#91333) v. N. BURL CAIN, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Jun 10, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-350-JJB-SCR (M.D. La. Jun. 10, 2014)