From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roberts v. Williams

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Dec 7, 2011
373 P.3d 956 (Nev. 2011)

Opinion

No. 56967.

12-07-2011

Ken ROBERTS, Appellant, v. Brian WILLIAMS, Respondent.

Ken Roberts Clark County District Attorney


Ken Roberts

Clark County District Attorney

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

This is a proper person appeal from an order of the district court denying a post-conviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus . Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Doug Smith, Judge.

This appeal has been submitted for decision without oral argument, NRAP 34(f)(3), and we conclude that the record is sufficient for our review and briefing is unwarranted. See

In his petition filed on May 25, 2010, appellant sought 433 days of presentence credit. Based upon our review, we conclude that the district court did not err in denying the petition. This court considered and rejected appellant's claim for 433 days of additional presentence credits. See Roberts v. State, Docket No. 56132 (Order of Affirmance, October 5, 2011). The doctrine of the law of the case prevents further litigation of this claim. Hall v. State, 91 Nev. 314, 535 P.2d 797 (1975). Therefore, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

Luckett v. Warden, 91 Nev. 681, 682, 541 P.2d 910, 911 (1975).


Summaries of

Roberts v. Williams

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Dec 7, 2011
373 P.3d 956 (Nev. 2011)
Case details for

Roberts v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:Ken ROBERTS, Appellant, v. Brian WILLIAMS, Respondent.

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada.

Date published: Dec 7, 2011

Citations

373 P.3d 956 (Nev. 2011)