From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roberts v. Univ. Health Sys.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Jan 5, 2022
No. 04-21-00526-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 5, 2022)

Opinion

04-21-00526-CV

01-05-2022

Brandon ROBERTS, Appellant v. UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM, Sarah Abang-Hayes, MD, Medical Center Pavilion Pharmacy, and Accord HealthCare Inc., Appellees


From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2021-CI-00455 Honorable Tina Torres, Judge Presiding.

ORDER

Irene Rios, Justice.

In his second amended petition, appellant Brandon Roberts brought various claims against Sarah Abang-Hayes, Accord Healthcare Inc. ("Accord"), and Bexar County Hospital District d/b/a University Health f/k/a University Health System (the "Hospital"). Accord filed a Rule 91a motion to dismiss the claims against it, which was granted by the trial court. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 91a. The record before us does not contain an order disposing of the claims against Abang-Hayes or the Hospital. Roberts filed a notice of appeal, indicating he intends to appeal from the trial court's order granting Accord's Rule 91a motion to dismiss.

A judgment or order is final for purposes of appeal if it actually disposes of all pending parties and claims before the court. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). Here, the trial court's order granting Accord's Rule 91a motion is interlocutory because it does not dispose of all parties and claims. Further, the record before us does not include any motion severing claims or parties. Thus, the order is not final and appealable. Interlocutory orders may be appealed only if a specific statute authorizes such an interlocutory appeal. For example, section 51.014 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code lists circumstances under which a party may appeal from an interlocutory order of a district court, county court at law, or county court. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014. We cannot, however, find any statutory authority that allows a party to appeal from an interlocutory order granting a Rule 91a motion to dismiss such as the one contained in the record before us. See In re Farmers Tex. Cnty. Mut. Ins. Co., 604 S.W.3d 421, 429 (Tex. App.-San Antonio 2019, orig. proceeding); Tamborello v. Town of Highland Park, No. 05-20-00755-CV, 2021 WL 1540653, at *1 (Tex. App -Dallas 2021, no pet.).

We, therefore, ORDER appellant to show cause in writing by January 19, 2022, why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). We suspend all appellate deadlines pending our determination of whether we have jurisdiction over this appeal.


Summaries of

Roberts v. Univ. Health Sys.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Jan 5, 2022
No. 04-21-00526-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 5, 2022)
Case details for

Roberts v. Univ. Health Sys.

Case Details

Full title:Brandon ROBERTS, Appellant v. UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM, Sarah Abang-Hayes…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio

Date published: Jan 5, 2022

Citations

No. 04-21-00526-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 5, 2022)