From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roberts v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 16, 1967
385 F.2d 418 (9th Cir. 1967)

Opinion

No. 21450.

November 16, 1967.

Bernard G. Winsberg, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

Wm. M. Byrne, Jr., U.S. Atty., Robert L. Brosio, Michael Heuer, Asst. U.S. Attys., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before KOELSCH and BROWNING, Circuit Judges, and POWELL, District Judge.


Appellant seeks reversal of the judgment of the district court convicting him of violating the Dyer Act ( 18 U.S.C. § 2312). His assignments all concern the sufficiency of the evidence to support the finding of guilt and the propriety of the court's ruling permitting the prosecution to reopen its case in chief. None has merit, nor tenders a question which on this record warrants discussion in an opinion.

We affirm.


Summaries of

Roberts v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 16, 1967
385 F.2d 418 (9th Cir. 1967)
Case details for

Roberts v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Patrick Arthur ROBERTS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Nov 16, 1967

Citations

385 F.2d 418 (9th Cir. 1967)