From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roberts v. UBS AG

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 11, 2012
CASE NO. CV F 12-0724 LJO SKO (E.D. Cal. Dec. 11, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. CV F 12-0724 LJO SKO

12-11-2012

NADIA ROBERTS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UBS AG, et al., Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

(Doc. 18.)

On November 19, 2012, defendant UBS AG filed a motion a F.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss and set a December 20, 2012 hearing. The deadline to file an amended complaint under F.R.Civ.P. 15(a)(1)(B) will expire no later than December 13, 2012. The deadline to oppose UBS AG's F.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss expired on December 6, 2012. As such, this Court ORDERS plaintiffs, no later than December 13, 2012, to file and serve papers to show good cause why this Court should not dismiss this action. This Court will discharge this order to show cause if plaintiffs, no later than December 13, 2012, file a first amended complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Lawrence J. O'Neill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Roberts v. UBS AG

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 11, 2012
CASE NO. CV F 12-0724 LJO SKO (E.D. Cal. Dec. 11, 2012)
Case details for

Roberts v. UBS AG

Case Details

Full title:NADIA ROBERTS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UBS AG, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 11, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. CV F 12-0724 LJO SKO (E.D. Cal. Dec. 11, 2012)