Roberts v. UBS AG

Full title: NADIA ROBERTS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UBS AG, et al., Defendants.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 13, 2012

CASE NO. CV F 12-0724 LJO SKO (E.D. Cal. Dec. 13, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. CV F 12-0724 LJO SKO

12-13-2012

NADIA ROBERTS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UBS AG, et al., Defendants.

Lawrence J. O'Neill

ORDER TO VACATE HEARING AND TO

TERM MOTION

(Doc. 18.)

On November 19, 2012, defendant UBS AG filed its F.R.Civ.P. 12 motion to dismiss plaintiffs' original complaint and set a December 20, 2012 hearing. On December 13, 2012, plaintiffs filed their first amended complaint as a matter of course under F.R.Civ.P. 15(a)(1). As such, this Court:

1. VACATES the December 20, 2012 hearing in that the first amended complaint renders moot the F.R.Civ.P. 12 motion to dismiss the original complaint;
2. DIRECTS the clerk to term the F.R.Civ.P. 12 motion to dismiss the original complaint (doc. 18); and
3. ORDERS UBS AG, no later than January 14, 2012, to file papers to respond to the first amended complaint.

This Court will take no further action on the F.R.Civ.P. 12 motion to dismiss the original complaint (doc. 18).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Lawrence J. O'Neill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE