From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roberts v. Uber Techs.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Feb 9, 2023
2:22-cv-00635-CDS-VCF (D. Nev. Feb. 9, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-00635-CDS-VCF

02-09-2023

CARLOS ROBERTS, Plaintiff, v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a foreign corporation, dba UBER; RASIER LLC, a foreign limited liability company, dba UBER; JAMES RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY; DOE CLAIM ADJUSTER I through X; DOE CLAIM SUPERVISOR I through X; ROE INSURANCE COMPANY XI through XX; DOES I through X, inclusive; ROE CORPORATION XI through XX, inclusive and ROE COMPANIES I-X, Defendants.

BREMER WHYTE BROWN & O'MEARA, LLP Lucian J. Greco, Jr., Esq. Nevada State Bar No. 10600 Devin R. Gifford, Esq. Nevada State Bar No. 14055 Matthew J. Cook, Esq. Nevada State Bar No. 15028 Attorneys for Defendant, James River Insurance Company BIGHORN LAW Joshua P. Berrett, Esq. Nevada State Bar No. 12697 Attorneys for Plaintiff, Carlos Roberts


BREMER WHYTE BROWN & O'MEARA, LLP Lucian J. Greco, Jr., Esq. Nevada State Bar No. 10600 Devin R. Gifford, Esq. Nevada State Bar No. 14055 Matthew J. Cook, Esq. Nevada State Bar No. 15028 Attorneys for Defendant, James River Insurance Company

BIGHORN LAW Joshua P. Berrett, Esq. Nevada State Bar No. 12697 Attorneys for Plaintiff, Carlos Roberts

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

COME NOW, Defendant James River Insurance Company (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant”), by and through its attorneys of record, Lucian J. Greco, Esq., Devin R. Gifford, Esq., and Matthew J. Cook, Esq. of Bremer, Whyte, Brown & O'Meara, LLP, and Plaintiff Carlos Roberts (“Plaintiff'), by and through his attorney of record Joshua P. Berrett, Esq. of Bighorn Law, and hereby stipulate to dismiss Plaintiff Carlos Roberts' Operative Complaint against all Defendants, including Defendant James River Insurance Company with prejudice. Each party to bear their own costs and attorneys' fees.

ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Carlos Roberts' Operative Complaint against all Defendants, including Defendant James River Insurance Company, is dismissed with prejudice. Each party to bear their own costs and attorneys' fees.

Defendants, Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC, were dismissed without prejudice on June 13, 2022, with each party to bear their own fees and attorney fees and costs. ECF No. 24.

The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Roberts v. Uber Techs.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Feb 9, 2023
2:22-cv-00635-CDS-VCF (D. Nev. Feb. 9, 2023)
Case details for

Roberts v. Uber Techs.

Case Details

Full title:CARLOS ROBERTS, Plaintiff, v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a foreign…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Feb 9, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-00635-CDS-VCF (D. Nev. Feb. 9, 2023)