Roberts v. Tway Construction Co.

3 Citing cases

  1. Multiple Injury Trust Fund v. Garrett

    408 P.3d 169 (Okla. 2017)

    See also Okla. Power Co. v. State Indus. Comm'n, 1932 OK 171, ¶ 5, 156 Okla. 121, 9 P.2d 443, 444 (This Court held that the approval of a joint petition by the State Industrial Commission was a final adjudication and will not be subject to a collateral attack after the appeal time has expired.). No controlling distinction exists between adjudications memorialized by a final order and a judge-approved joint petition. Roberts v. Tway Constr. Co., 1974 OK 128, ¶ 18, 528 P.2d 1389, 1392. Simply put, an "adjudication" is any judicial action, See Depuy v. Hoeme, 1989 OK 42, ¶¶ 8–9, 775 P.2d 1339, 1342–43, including actions memorialized in a joint petition. Black, Sivalls & Bryson v. Bass, 1973 OK 9, ¶ 8, 506 P.2d 902, 904.

  2. Curwood Inc. v. Camp

    264 P.3d 140 (Okla. Civ. App. 2011)

    ¶ 12 Joint Petition Settlements only cover the injuries set out in the agreement. Roberts v. Tway Construction Company, 1974 OK 128, 528 P.2d 1389. Also, see, Tell v. City of Perry, 2003 OK CIV APP 71, 76 P.3d 106. Claimants cumulative trauma injury is separate and distinct from the single event injury covered by the agreement. ¶ 13 Employer lastly suggests Claimant's alleged injuries were in retaliation for her separation and termination.

  3. Curwood, Inc. v. Camp

    2011 OK Civ. App. 114 (Okla. Civ. App. 2011)

    ¶ 12 Joint Petition Settlements only cover the injuries set out in the agreement. Roberts v. Tway Construction Company, 1974 OK 128, 528 P.2d 1389. Also, see, Tell v. City of Perry, 2003 OK CIV APP 71, 76 P.3d 106. Claimants cumulative trauma injury is separate and distinct from the single event injury covered by the agreement. ¶ 13 Employer lastly suggests Claimant's alleged injuries were in retaliation for her separation and termination.