From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roberts v. T.D.T., Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Apr 1, 2011
67 So. 3d 282 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

Opinion

No. 5D09-1942.

April 1, 2011.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County, Sandra Edwards-Stephens, Judge.

Richard A. Staggard, of Farah Farah, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellant.

Candy L. Messersmith and David B. Shelton, of Rumberger, Kirk Caldwell, A Professional Association, Orlando, for Appellee.


Richard Roberts ["Roberts"], as personal representative of the estate of Keith Roberts, appeals a final judgment rendered pursuant to a jury verdict awarding Roberts and his wife each $15,000 for past pain and suffering, but nothing for future pain and suffering. Roberts also appeals the denial of his motion for additur or, in the alternative, motion for new trial. On appeal, Roberts argues that the jury award of zero future noneconomic damages was against the manifest weight of the evidence and that a series of erroneous rulings by the lower court deprived Roberts of a fair trial. We affirm.

After examining the testimony and evidence admitted at trial, we see no reversible error on the damages issue. Nor do we find that the trial court reversibly erred in the evidentiary issues raised on appeal or the complaint, about statements made by defense counsel during opening or closing argument. The failure to allow substitution of the plaintiffs liability expert at the eleventh hour was not, under the circumstances, an abuse of discretion.

AFFIRMED.

MONACO, C.J., GRIFFIN and TORPY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Roberts v. T.D.T., Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Apr 1, 2011
67 So. 3d 282 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)
Case details for

Roberts v. T.D.T., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Richard ROBERTS, Individually and as Personal, etc., Appellant, v. T.D.T.…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Apr 1, 2011

Citations

67 So. 3d 282 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)