From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roberts v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Nov 1, 2002
829 So. 2d 350 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

Case No. 2D01-3504

Opinion filed November 1, 2002.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; J Michael McCarthy, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Robert D. Rosen, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Susan M. Shanahan, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


Affirmed.

WHATLEY and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.

BLUE, C.J., Concurs with opinion.


I concur in the affirmance; however, I am compelled to point out that the trial court erroneously allowed the officer to testify that there was an outstanding warrant for Mr. Roberts. Such testimony was inadmissible evidence of collateral crimes. See § 90.404(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2000). The evidence of the warrant was not relevant to prove any material fact in issue in this case. Therefore, its only relevance was to show bad character and the propensity to commit a crime on the part of Mr. Roberts. However, based on all the facts of this case, I conclude the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. See State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 1986).


Summaries of

Roberts v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Nov 1, 2002
829 So. 2d 350 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Roberts v. State

Case Details

Full title:TERRY ROBERTS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Nov 1, 2002

Citations

829 So. 2d 350 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)