From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roberts v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Sep 29, 1965
178 So. 2d 701 (Fla. 1965)

Opinion

No. 34509.

September 29, 1965.

Elester S. Roberts, in pro. per.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and James G. Mahorner, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.


The petitioner alleges that he was convicted of a felony on the basis of a judicial confession obtained at a preliminary hearing at which he was deprived of the assistance of counsel. Harris v. State, Fla., 162 So.2d 262; Sardinia v. State, Fla., 168 So.2d 674. The return concedes that petitioner has exhausted his available remedies under Criminal Procedure Rule 1. Mitchell v. Wainwright, Fla., 155 So.2d 868. The return further concedes the necessity of an evidentiary hearing to determine the issue as to when and under what circumstances the alleged confession was obtained. This issue is framed by the allegations of paragraph 17 of the petition and paragraph 23 of the return.

The Honorable Neil C. McMullen, a Circuit Judge of the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit, is appointed a Commissioner to take such testimony as shall be deemed necessary on the issue above described, and thereafter with all convenient speed report the same, together with his findings and recommendations to this Court.

The petitioner is authorized to proceed in forma pauperis. The Commissioner is authorized to appoint an attorney to represent petitioner in these proceedings.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C.J., and THOMAS, DREW, O'CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Roberts v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Sep 29, 1965
178 So. 2d 701 (Fla. 1965)
Case details for

Roberts v. State

Case Details

Full title:ELESTER S. ROBERTS, PETITIONER, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Sep 29, 1965

Citations

178 So. 2d 701 (Fla. 1965)

Citing Cases

Holstein v. Wainwright

        The petition filed herein affirmatively shows that no petition for habeas corpus has been filed in…