Opinion
No. 05-04-00812-CR
Opinion Filed October 10, 2005. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P. 47.
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. F02-73994-PI. Affirmed.
Before Justices WHITTINGTON, FRANCIS, and LANG.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Kenneth Byron Roberts pleaded guilty to burglary of a habitation and true to two enhancement paragraphs. The trial judge deferred adjudicating guilt and placed appellant on ten years' community supervision. The State later moved to adjudicate guilt, alleging numerous violations of probation. Following a hearing, the trial judge adjudicated appellant guilty and sentenced him to twenty-five years' imprisonment. Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant he has a right to file a pro se response, but appellant did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court's judgment.