From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roberts v. State

Supreme Court of Florida.
Jun 28, 2012
95 So. 3d 214 (Fla. 2012)

Opinion

No. SC12–192.

2012-06-28

Allen ROBERTS, Jr., Petitioner(s) v. STATE of Florida, Respondent(s).


Because a writ of mandamus cannot be issued to direct the manner in which a court shall act in the lawful exercise of its jurisdiction, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. State ex rel. North St. Lucie River Drainage Dist. v. Kanner, 11 So.2d 889, 890 (Fla.1943); see also Migliore v. City of Lauderhill, 415 So.2d 62, 63 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982) (stating that mandamus “is not an appropriate vehicle for review of a merely erroneous decision nor is it proper to mandate the doing (or undoing) of a discretionary act”), approved, 431 So.2d 986 (Fla.1983). Any motions or other requests for relief are hereby denied.

PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Roberts v. State

Supreme Court of Florida.
Jun 28, 2012
95 So. 3d 214 (Fla. 2012)
Case details for

Roberts v. State

Case Details

Full title:Allen ROBERTS, Jr., Petitioner(s) v. STATE of Florida, Respondent(s).

Court:Supreme Court of Florida.

Date published: Jun 28, 2012

Citations

95 So. 3d 214 (Fla. 2012)