From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roberts v. State

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Jul 2, 2014
No. 04-14-00384-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 2, 2014)

Opinion

No. 04-14-00384-CR

07-02-2014

Clay Arron ROBERTS, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee


MEMORANDUM OPINION


From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR2824W

Honorable George H. Godwin, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

The trial court imposed sentence in the underlying cause on April 8, 2014. Even if we construed appellant's motion to reduce state jail felony to a misdemeanor as a motion for new trial, the motion would not extend the deadline to file appellant's notice of appeal because it was not timely filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 21.4(a). Because appellant did not file a timely motion for new trial, the notice of appeal was due to be filed May 8, 2014. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). A motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal was due on May 23, 2014. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. Appellant filed a notice of appeal on May 28, 2014, and appellant did not file a motion for extension of time.

A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke a court of appeals' jurisdiction. See Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). A late notice of appeal may be considered timely so as to invoke a court of appeals' jurisdiction if (1) it is filed within fifteen days of the last day allowed for filing, (2) a motion for extension of time is filed in the court of appeals within fifteen days of the last day allowed for filing the notice of appeal, and (3) the court of appeals grants the motion for extension of time. See id. After reviewing the record, it appeared that appellant's notice of appeal was untimely filed.

On June 4, 2014, we ordered appellant to show cause in writing by June 18, 2014, why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See id.; see also Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (out-of-time appeal from final felony conviction may be sought by filing a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure). Appellant did not file a response to our order. Because appellant's notice of appeal was untimely filed, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522.

In our order, we also noted the trial court's certification in this appeal states that "this criminal case is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal." The clerk's record contains a written plea bargain, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant; therefore, the trial court's certification accurately reflects that the criminal case is a plea-bargain case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides, "The appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has a right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules." TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH


Summaries of

Roberts v. State

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Jul 2, 2014
No. 04-14-00384-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 2, 2014)
Case details for

Roberts v. State

Case Details

Full title:Clay Arron ROBERTS, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

Date published: Jul 2, 2014

Citations

No. 04-14-00384-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 2, 2014)