From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roberts v. Paige

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jan 10, 2014
Case No. 10-cv-13743 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 10, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 10-cv-13743

01-10-2014

HAROLD ROBERTS (#96167), Plaintiff, v. BERNARD PAIGE, DR. D. MORRIS, MS. CHAPMAN, MR. JUSTICE, GLENN WILSON and WILLIAM EPLING Defendants.


Paul D. Borman

United States District Judge


Paul J. Komives

United States Magistrate Judge


ORDER (1) ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S SEPTEMBER 12, 2013 REPORT

AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING DEFENDANTS MORRIS, CHAPMAN AND

JUSTICE (Dkt. 42); (2) DISMISSING DEFENDANTS MORRIS, CHAPMAN AND

JUSTICE FOR PLAINTIFF'S FAILURE TO PROSECUTE; AND (3) CLOSING THE

CASE SINCE DEFENDANTS PAIGE, WILSON AND EPLING WERE PREVIOUSLY

DISMISSED BY THIS COURT'S ORDER OF SEPTEMBER 27, 2013 (Dkt. 43)

Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Paul J. Komives' Report and Recommendation regarding Defendants Morris, Chapman and Justice. (Dkt. 42). The Report and Recommendation sets forth that Defendants Morris, Chapman and Justice have not appeared and have not been served in this action. Further, the Report and Recommendation describes the numerous attempts the Court has made to ascertain Defendant Morris, Chapman and Justice's contact information. (Dkt. 42, at 3-5). Finally, the Court notes that Magistrate Judge Komives ordered Plaintiff to fully identify and provide correct addresses for Defendants Morris, Chapman and Justice on November 8, 2012. (Dkt. 39). Plaintiff failed to respond to this order and never identified or supplied the Defendants' correct addresses. As a result of these facts, Magistrate Judge Komives' recommends dismissing Defendants Morris, Chapman, and Justice for Plaintiff's failure to prosecute.

Having reviewed that Report and Recommendation, and there being no timely objections from any party under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and E.D. Mich L.R. 72.1(d), the Court:

(1) ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation;
(2) DISMISSES Defendants Morris, Chapman and Justice for Plaintiff's failure to prosecute; and
(3) CLOSES the case since Defendants Paige, Wilson, and Epling were previously dismissed by this Court's Order of September 27, 2013.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________

PAUL D. BORMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on January 10, 2014.

Deborah Tofil

Case Manager


Summaries of

Roberts v. Paige

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jan 10, 2014
Case No. 10-cv-13743 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 10, 2014)
Case details for

Roberts v. Paige

Case Details

Full title:HAROLD ROBERTS (#96167), Plaintiff, v. BERNARD PAIGE, DR. D. MORRIS, MS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 10, 2014

Citations

Case No. 10-cv-13743 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 10, 2014)